South Dakota mayoral candidates separated by just two votes in shockingly close race, recount expected

Christine Erickson, a former South Dakota state representative and former Sioux Falls city council member, is leading state Sen. Jamie Smith, who is also a former state House member, by that razor-thin two-vote margin.
The candidates have 18,280 and 18,278 votes respectively.
WHAT’S NEXT FOR KRISTI NOEM? 2026 SENATE CHATTER GROWS AFTER DHS EXIT
Smith, who plans to request a recount, said during a phone call with Fox News Digital on Thursday that “every vote does count,” noting, “This is exactly an election that shows you that.”
While the race was nonpartisan, Smith is listed as a Democrat on the South Dakota legislature’s website, while Erickson, who served in the state House over a decade ago, is listed as a Republican on the site.
SOUTH DAKOTA GOVERNOR SURVIVES CROWDED PRIMARY — FOR NOW
“Thank you Sioux Falls! To my family, friends and supporters, I couldn’t have done this without you. This election exemplified that every single vote truly matters. To the people of Sioux Falls, even with a close margin, I am beyond grateful for the opportunity to lead Sioux Falls forward for the next four years,” Erickson said in a Wednesday statement.
“Even though the polls have closed, the fight continues. We know there will be a recount and I feel confident going into this next phase. My team and I are prepared to make sure the recount moves forward fairly with accuracy and transparency,” she continued.
TRUMP MAKES LATE-NIGHT ENDORSEMENTS IN SIX STATES AHEAD OF TUESDAY PRIMARIES, INCLUDING CALIFORNIA
“Congratulations also to Jamie for a hard fought campaign. Sioux Falls has a bright future, and we will come together to make sure our community thrives today and for generations to come. My promise is the same as it was on day one of this campaign: I will lead with common sense and make sure city government serves you, the people. I’m excited to get to work,” she concluded.
You may also like
Related
By admin
Archives
- July 2026
- June 2026
- May 2026
- April 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- August 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- January 2020
- March 2011
- February 2011
- April 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- November 2007
- May 2006
- September 2005
- August 2005
- March 2003
- October 2002
- June 2001
- April 2001
- January 2001

Leave a Reply