Federal judge blocks Postal Service from carrying out Trump mail-in ballot order

President Donald Trump had ordered the postal service to transmit ballots for states only if those states first provided a list of mail-in voters, among other requirements. The ruling from U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan blocks the postal service from implementing the order nationwide.
Sullivan argued that the order would violate the settlement agreement in an earlier 2020 lawsuit between the postal service and the NAACP. That agreement allowed the courts to oversee the postal service’s actions relating to the “monitoring and timely delivery of Election Mail.”
“The Proposed Rule violates paragraph 2 of the Agreement because the Postal Service cannot post documents reflecting ‘practices and policies for prioritizing the monitoring and timely delivery of Election Mail’ if its policies provide that it will not accept ‘noncompliant mailing’ and therefore will not deliver mail-in or absentee ballots to some voters, and if it will not mail ballots to any voters in a state where the state ‘declines or fails to certify a list,’” Sullivan wrote in his opinion.
Sullivan’s order comes after an earlier case saw nearly 25 states challenge Trump’s order earlier this year. Those states were successful in blocking the postal service from carrying out the order in their states, but Sullivan’s ruling extends nationwide.
The ruling also comes just a week after an Obama-appointed judge blocked Trump’s effort to curb noncitizens from registering to vote or voting in federal elections.
OBAMA-APPOINTED JUDGE BLOCKS TRUMP’S ELECTION ORDER AS SAVE AMERICA ACT FIGHT INTENSIFIES
The lawsuit in that case centered on Trump’s March executive order, Executive Order (EO) 14248, which directed the creation of a federal voter registration list and imposed new restrictions on eligibility for voting by mail as part of the administration’s broader effort to combat voter fraud.
“President Trump is committed to ensuring that Americans have full confidence in the administration of our elections. The President’s executive order lawfully protects our elections, and we are confident that we will ultimately prevail in its implementation,” White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson told Fox News Digital last week.
Fox News’ Ashley DiMella contributed to this report.
You may also like
Related
By admin
Archives
- July 2026
- June 2026
- May 2026
- April 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- August 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- January 2020
- March 2011
- February 2011
- April 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- November 2007
- May 2006
- September 2005
- August 2005
- March 2003
- October 2002
- June 2001
- April 2001
- January 2001

Leave a Reply