Federal appeals court rejects Trump bid to enforce mail ballot order ahead of midterm elections

In a 2-1 decision, the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals denied the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) request to pause a June ruling blocking several provisions of Trump’s March executive order while the administration appeals.
The DOJ previously told the court it could seek emergency relief from the Supreme Court if it did not prevail.
The administration argued the lawsuit was premature because federal agencies had not finalized the policies needed to implement the executive order. But the appeals court found the plaintiff states were already facing looming election deadlines and had begun preparing for potential changes.
OBAMA-APPOINTED JUDGE BLOCKS TRUMP’S ELECTION ORDER AS SAVE AMERICA ACT FIGHT INTENSIFIES
“As the district court reasoned, the (executive order) lays out a clear set of rapidly approaching deadlines by which states must coordinate with federal officials and comply with new voting procedures,” the majority wrote. “The Plaintiff States have no practical choice but to respond to the (order) now.”
Trump signed Executive Order 14399 in March as part of his election integrity agenda.
The order directs the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to compile lists of confirmed U.S. citizens eligible to vote and provide them to states, instructs the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) to establish new standards for mail-in ballots and directs the Justice Department to prioritize investigations into state and local election officials who issue federal ballots to people deemed ineligible to vote.
The lawsuit was brought by 23 states and the District of Columbia, led by California, Massachusetts, Nevada and Washington. The states argue the Constitution gives them primary responsibility for administering federal elections and that the president exceeded his authority by directing federal agencies to impose new voting requirements.
U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani agreed in June, ruling that several provisions of the executive order likely exceeded the president’s authority and blocking federal agencies from implementing them in the plaintiff states through the Nov. 3 federal elections.
Saturday’s ruling does not resolve the underlying legal challenge but leaves Talwani’s injunction in place while the appeal proceeds.
The White House and the Justice Department did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital’s requests for comment.
You may also like
Related
By admin
Archives
- August 2026
- July 2026
- June 2026
- May 2026
- April 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- August 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- February 2022
- January 2020
- March 2011
- February 2011
- April 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- November 2007
- May 2006
- September 2005
- August 2005
- March 2003
- October 2002
- June 2001
- April 2001
- January 2001

Leave a Reply